1. INTRODUCTION:

The digital atmosphere is an interrelated kingdom helped by the TCP/IP protocol, surrounding info and communication technologies for example the internet, software, hardware, social media, virtual reality, artificial intelligence etc (Gubbi, 2013). This area rotates round data, which can be interconnected, stored, and administered, allowing swift exchange of information across the world (Borgia, 2014). A pattern shift has taken place in the way the people connect, effort, and access data, form the present generation to be in synchronization with cybernetic (Floridi, 2014). Though, it also increases worries about confidentiality, safety, and the right of a extremely allied world.

The digitally organized world is affecting at the haste of believed with the assistances of leading-edge digital technology (Steger, 2023). But the term “pollution" characteristically neurologically fostering in our awareness the pictures of smog-filled skies or plastic-choked oceans and lots of troubling clamours. Digital pollution, also recognized as e-pollution, refers to the ecological effect triggered by the manufacturing, usage, and discarding of digital machineries. It includes an extensive variety of damaging effects such as the generation of electronic waste (e-waste), energy consumption related to digital actions, and the release of perilous matters during the manufacturing and removal of electronic goods.

Only a few reviews have been available where (Krumay and Brandtweiner, 2016) assessed the environmental effect of digital belongings, which are applied by establishments to control the environmental effects of info and communication technology (ICT) hardware. (Bieser and Hilty, 2018) focused on a comprehensive research review on the secondary environmental effects of ICTs and inspected the secondary environmental influence of the application of ICTs in other belongings and amenities and the ecological impacts of these aberrations. (Balogun, Marks, and Sharma, 2020) reviewed the current digitalization movement for educating ecological sustainability where researchers considered nine cases in several countries using developing technologies to state weather modification and the adaptation style. They specified that digital alterations could assist/restrict the effects of environment disparity in metropolitan cities. (Feroz, Zo, and Chiravuri, 2021) offered a summary that how and where such digital modifications occurred in ecological sustainability. The research clarified the straight consequence on the atmosphere; on the contrary, the secondary consequence had not been specified. (Bieser and Hilty, 2018) focused on the secondary influence of the application of ICTs on the air and did not state the primary effect. On the opposite, the researchers attentive on the effect of digitalization on atmosphere transformation adaptation and sustainable development.

This stances important ecological and health risks, as inappropriate removal of electronic devices can lead to soil and water adulteration. Also, the energy consumption of data centres and electronic devices pays to greenhouse gas emanations. Talking digital pollution needs applying sustainable practices in the plan, engineering, and discarding of electronic goods, as well as endorsing accountable use of digital technologies. Though, in such an odd scenario, the less noticeable hitherto similarly furtive form of contamination, i.e., 'digital pollution,' is barely predictable by our limbic system to trigger the fight-or-flight response. Our need on technology lasts to flow, and so does the ecological influence of our digital events (Das, 2022).

1.1 Birth of Digital Pollution:

Digital pollution includes an extensive variety of ecological threats connected to our digital actions. This contains the energy consumption of data centres, e-waste produced from discarded electronics, and the carbon footprint of internet usage. In current years, the exponential development of data-driven technologies, cloud computing, and the proliferation of internet-enabled devices have meaningfully improved the ecological toll of our digital footmark (Das B., 2023).

1.2 Energy consumption in the milieu of data centres:

Energy consumption in the milieu of data centres denotes to the amount of electrical control these amenities use to function their computing infrastructure, networking equipment, cooling systems, and other supporting mechanisms. Data centres are critical infrastructure that store, process, and manage large dimensions of digital information for numerous purposes, like cloud computing, internet services, and enterprise applications. Due to the high-performance difficulties of contemporary computing and the need for dependable and nonstop operations, data centres can be important consumers of electrical energy. This energy is used to power servers, storage devices, networking equipment, and the systems that preserve the proper ecological situations within the capability.

Data centres are the unsung workhorses of this digital era, housing the servers that store, process, and communicate the vast volumes of data that Homosapiens make on a daily basis. These centres necessitate huge quantities of energy to function, with some services consuming as much power as a small town. The energy-intensive process of cooling servers exacerbates this ecological straining.

1. The Dim Side of Digital Progression: E-Waste:

E-waste is the unused electrical or electronic devices. These devices can range from small appliances like pen drive, mobile phones, and laptops to larger appliances like refrigerators and washing machines. E-waste is a important and rising global matter due to the fast pace of technological progression and the consequential uselessness of older gadgets. The swift pace of technological progression is concomitantly leading to an astounding rise in E-waste. Rejected devices like smartphones, laptops, tablets and different IOTs are attached to the growth of the e-waste hazard. Inappropriate discarding of these electronics not only leads to the release of unsafe materials, but also wastes valuable resources. To allay this matter, accountable reprocessing and restoration has become imperative.

2.1 Generation of E-Waste: A Question to The Ecological Health:

The ever-changing lifestyle of people, combined with urbanization, has focused to snowballing effects of consumption of electronic junk which made electronic waste management a question of ecological and health concern. E-waste is thru by homes, the administration, the community and private organization, computer factories, and manufacturers. The fast rate of technological modification has focused on the fast unfashionableness of electronic devices, creating electronic waste in the procedure that becomes extra to the waste stream. The fast expansion of the electronics industry and the current consumer principles of growing rates of consumption of electronic goods have led to disastrous biological costs (Jaragh and Boushahri, 2009).

The e-waste that industrialized from such a technical rebellion will have a sure and enduring effect on humans live. E-waste is not only the left-over come from communication technology and related devices, but it also covers the waste of all electrical applications, e.g., kitchen purposes, domestic uses, TVs, mobile devices, etc. Electronic device is known to contain unsafe things. If disposed of unsuitably, they pose a probable hazard to human well-being and the atmosphere. Heavy compounds, such as Lead, Cadmium, Mercury, and other deadly amalgamations, such as PVC and plastic, pose such coercions. Statistics show that 40% of all lead and 70% of other heavy metals found in landfills are e-waste-related, predominantly from high-tech goods. The principal matter that contributed to the rise in e-waste is the fast and sustained technological growth and the reduction of the computer life span from 10 years in the 1980's to about 2-3 years or less at the current time. The parallel cause may hold correct for other devices, e.g., mobile phones, games, and multimedia devices. (Jaragh and Boushahri, 2009).

2.2 The Problematic Electronic Devices:

Numerous manufacturing features may increase that distinguish them from manufacturing other stuffs, such as:

Not Designed for Recycling: Maximum electronic objects are not planned with the end-of-life stage of the product in mind. Creators stress on the manufacturing of the product but they typically overlook the realisms of how the product will be handled when it's excluded. There are two ways that products are not planned for recycling:

· Selecting hard-to-recycle materials and

· Scheming products that are tough to dismantle

2.3.1 Selecting Hard-to-Recycle Materials:

The ingredients used in electronics are the major challenge for reutilizing. The lethal things in these stuffs actually make it unbearable to reprocess them back into electronic goods. Here are some of the encounters:

Cathode Ray Tube glass: CRT televisions and monitors hold four to eight pounds of lead, typically in the glass of the CRT (Nnorom, Osibanjo, and Ogwuegbu, 2011).. This glass can only also go into a lead smelter or go into "glass-to-glass" reprocessing—to a producer who takes old CRT glass and makes new CRTs out of it. Meanwhile, the decrease marketplace for CRTs, this has put many glass-to-glass reprocessing processes out of commercial. Dealing rationally with CRT glass is one of the recyclers' main tasks.

Plastics: Plastics include an excessive size of greatest electronic objects. But maximum of them have poisonous essences, either brominated flame retardants or PVC, which make them also adulterated to reprocess into innovative electronic goods. A lot of the secondhand plastics are used as collective in highway construction. (Lahtela, Hamod, and Kärki, 2022).

2.3.2 Scheming products that are tough to dismantle:

Recyclers characteristically do some amount of product dismantlement as the primary stage in the recycling process, at a least to eradicate the toxic components. But several products are not planned to be naturally disassembled, using glue instead of fasteners, using a whole range of screw sizes in one product, making it hard to find fasteners, etc.

The LCD television can be taken as a case for how electronics are not planned with reprocessing in mind since of both material assortment and physical design. Highest numbers of LCD televisions use mercury lamps to light the screen. Mercury is very fatal, even in very small amounts. Therefore, an accountable recycler would want to remove these mercury lamps before putting the rest of the device in a shredder or doing other dispensation that might lead to mercury contact for reprocessing workers. Thus, one must undo the entire TV set first, a process that takes a long period and as a result, some recyclers just throw the whole screen in the shredder, unquestionably revealing their labours to mercury. The "glass" in the LCD screen is build-up of a layer of various types of liquid crystals. The liquid crystals are one of the most special things in the television. The "recommended" method of discarding of liquid crystals is ignition.

2.4 Alarms and Administration:

E-waste stances noteworthy ecological and health hazards if not managed properly. Many electronic devices cover hazardous things such as lead, mercury, and cadmium, which can pollute soil and water if not disposed of properly. Reprocessing and proper discarding procedures are critical to alleviate these hazards. Efforts are to be made worldwide to address e-waste through legislation, recycling plans, and the advancement of more sustainable strategy and manufacturing practices.

2.5 Suggestions:

E-waste is high-tech waste that comprises discarded TVs, computer monitors, keyboards, mouse, processors (CPUs), printers, scanners, fax machines, pocket computers (PDAs), walkie-talkies, baby monitors, certain kinds of watches, and cell phones—all digital that’s no more being used. Proper discarding of e-waste is vital since electronics encompass deadly things such as mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium, and beryllium that pose a risk to both humans and the atmosphere. The chief tactic to the action of e-waste is to reduce the consequence of the harmful elements and chemicals in this apparatus on the waste through decontamination, dismantling, reprocessing, the retrieval of substances of value, and then disposing of the rest.

Administrations and societies should be aware of the following:

· e-waste is a universal problem.

· It is snowballing at a growing degree.

· It has a certain undesirable effect on people and the air and should not be overlooked.

Suggestions should be considered by governments and taken very seriously:

· Law must be set.

· Reusing and serving the atmosphere

· Present plans for awareness.

· Encourage goods that are upgradeable and biodegradable.

· Encourage a take-back program (reduce trashing).

· Not to ship waste to incompetent and underdeveloped places.

· A hygienic atmosphere should be and is a human right, or else populations of this globe will have to face serious consequences.

3.1 Carbon Footprint of Internet Use:

It refers to the ecological influence related with the energy consumption and greenhouse gas productions resulting from actions connected to retrieving and using the internet. This comprises the process of data centres, network structure, end-user devices (like computers and smartphones), and the manufacturing, transportation, and disposal of these devices.

3.2 Kinds of Carbon Footprint in Internet Use:

· Data centres: These are amenities where servers and networking apparatus are stored. They need a important quantity of power to function and preserve the servers, keep them cool, and offer network connectivity. Data centres can be big energy consumers due to their high computational demands.

· End-User Devices: Computers, laptops, tablets, smartphones, and other internet-connected devices contribute to the carbon footprint of internet use. This comprises the energy essential for manufacturing, charging, and operating these devices.

· Network Infrastructure: This includes the apparatus and structure that allow the broadcast of data over the internet. This comprises routers, switches, and other networking equipment and fixtures. The energy used in transmitting data across the internet donates to its carbon footprint.

· Manufacturing and Disposal: The production of electronic devices involves energy-intensive methods. Moreover, the removal of devices at the end of their lifespan, if not done correctly, can affect the environment.

Every email sent, video streamed, or website visited transmits a unseen ecological charge. The energy required to transmit data across vast networks, along with the operation of end-user devices, pays to the carbon footprint of our digital connections. Moreover, the energy mix used by internet service providers differs extensively, with some trusting deeply on fossil fuels.

4.1 Addressing Digital Pollution:

A Communal Accountability:

4.1.1 Energy Effectiveness and Renewable Power: Highlighting energy competence in data centres and transitioning to renewable energy sources can meaningfully decrease the carbon footprint of the digital actions.

4.1.2 E-Waste Supervision:

Applying operative e-waste management practices, as well as accountable recycling and refurbishment, confirms that cast-off electronics do not end up in landfills or indecorously handled.

4.1.3 Digital Literacy and Mindful Consumption: Educating individuals and managements about the ecological influence of their digital activities allows them to make more conversant adoptions. This comprises practices like minimalizing pointless data storage and applying energy-efficient devices.

4.1.4 Rule and Strategy:

Administrations and supervisory bodies must play a critical role in applying sustainable practices within the techno industry. Applying and imposing environmental morals can incentivize companies to adopt greener technologies and processes.

5. Effects of lethal elements on well-being:

In developing nations, e-waste supervision is very informal, thus shaping management and disposal approaches. Underprivileged and demoted groups use basic means to recuperate valuable crystals from e-waste (Zezai, Maphosa, Mangwana, and Macherera, 2021). In emerging countries, e-waste is poised with municipal waste and finds its way into landfills, threatening the atmosphere and human well-being (Alam and Bahauddin, 2015). Airborne dioxins and heavy metals are free through elementary means such as burning and leaching, leading to ecological and epidemiologic disasters (Sthiannopkao and Wong, 2013). Research reveals that plentiful health complications, such as respiratory, gastrointestinal, dermatological, and other infectious diseases, are common at the Agbogbloshie e-waste landfill. Kids were observed burning cables and dismantling CRT displays, often using chisels and stones to break plastic casings (Böni, Schluep, and Widmer, 2014). Metal extraction is done by plunging printed circuit boards into acid or burning them, exposing them to the breath of toxic gases and contaminating the environment (Alam and Bahauddin, 2015). Investigators determined that nursing women could transfer hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDs) and other toxins to babies via breast milk (Yohannessen, et al., 2019). Research noted that poisonous chemicals like cadmium, chromium, and zinc etc. are moved to the foetus during gestation and found in newborn babies (Bommarito, Martin, and Fry, 2017). Open burning and burying e-waste cause infections such as thyroid, lung cancer, reproductive health problems, and other neurological ailments (Meem, Ahmed, Hossain, and Khan, 2021). Researchers exposed that heavy chemicals in e-waste, such as chromium, cadmium, and nickel, were connected with the umbilical cord, blood, and the foetus’s DNA damage, wheezing, and coughing in children (Zeng, Xu, Boezen, and Huo, 2016). Contact to e-waste changes the biomarker responsible for immunity assessment for infectious ailments, thereby hindering immunity from vaccination (Maphosa, 2022). Labors use elementary approaches to breathe in hazardous compounds like cadmium and other toxins (Tsydenova and Bengtsson, 2011). The World Health Organization informed that more than 18 million children are involved in casual e-waste recycling and are susceptible to catching many sicknesses through dermal exposure (Perkins, Drisse, Nxele, and Sly, 2014). Aquifers and water bodies near e-waste dumps are contaminated, affecting zones further from the dump (Olafisoye, Adefioye, and Osibote, 2013). Soil samples, river sediments, and underground water are contaminated by e-waste, causing skin injury, gastric ulcers, nausea, and headaches (Zezai, Maphosa, Mangwana, and Macherera, 2021).

6. CONCLUSION:

It's high time to change towards renewable energy sources. Efforts to upsurge energy efficiency in data centres mus become a priority to decrease the environmental influence and operational outlays. This contains using energy-efficient hardware, implementing innovative cooling techniques, and optimizing software and workload management. The carbon footprint of internet use hang on the energy sources used to power data centres and other organization. Data centres drove by renewable energy have a less ecological influence related to those motorized by fossil fuels. Actions that need a lot of data transfer, such as streaming high-definition videos, online gaming, and constant downloading/uploading, can subsidize suggestively to the carbon footprint.

The topographical setting of data centres and the energy grid they are linked to also has an influence on their carbon footprint. For instance, zones with a higher proportion of renewable energy in the grid will have lesser related productions. The site and competence of data storage can mark the carbon footprint. Cloud facilities that merge data and optimize resource usage can be more energy regimented. Dropping the carbon footprint of internet usage is a serious ecological goal line. This can be attained through numerous means, counting using renewable energy to power data centres, designing energy-efficient devices and structure, optimizing data transmission processes, and promoting accountable manufacturing and disposal practices. Moreover, individual users can contribute by adopting energy-saving behaviours and supporting companies and services that prioritize sustainability in their operations.

Digital pollution may not be evident in the same tangible form as air or water pollution, but its influence on our atmosphere is weighty and far-reaching. As we direct the digital scene, it is critical to distinguish the ecological significances of our movements. By accepting sustainable practices and advocating for responsible strategies, we can cooperatively alleviate the adverse effects of digital pollution and overlay the way for a more ecologically conscious digital future.

7. REFERENCE:

1. Alam, M., and Bahauddin, K. Electronic Waste in Bangladesh: Evaluating the Situation, Legislation and PoliWay Forward With Strategy and Approach. De Gryuter. 2015; 9(1): 81-101.

2. Balogun, A.-L., Marks, D., and Sharma, R. Assessing the potentials of digitalization as a tool for climate change adaptation and sustainable development in urban centres. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2020: 53.

3. Bieser, J. C., and Hilty, L. M. Assessing indirect environmental effects of information and communication technology (ICT): a systematic literature review. Sustainability. 2018; 10(8).

4. Bommarito, P. A., Martin, E., and Fry, R. C. Effects of prenatal exposure to endocrine disruptors and toxic metals on the fetal epigenome. Epigenomics. 2017; 9(3): 333-350.

5. Böni, H., Schluep, M., and Widmer, R. Recycling of ICT Equipment in Industrialized and Developing Countries, in ICT Innovations for Sustainability. (L. A. Hilty, Ed.) London Springer. 2014.

6. Borgia, E. The Internet of Things vision: Key features, applications and open issues. Computer Communications. 2014; 54: 1-31.

7. Das, B. Resistive Role of Digitization. COVID-19 and India’s Northeast: Psychological and Social Imprints. Psychological and Social Imprints. Taylor and Francis. 2022

8. Das, B. Social Engineering: A Digital Hypnotization Ploy. International Journal of Progressive Research in Engineering Management and Science. 2023; 3(9): 433-436. doi:https://www.doi.org/10.58257/IJPREMS32078

9. Feroz, A. K., Zo, H., and Chiravuri, A. Digital transformation and environmental sustainability: a review and research agenda. Sustainability. 2021; 13(3).

10. Floridi, L. The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. OUP Oxford. 2014

11. Gubbi, J. Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2013; 29(7): 1645-1660.

12. Jaragh, M., and Boushahri, J. The e-waste impact. In Proceedings of the First Kuwait Conference on e-Services and e-Systems. 2009: 1-7.

13. Krumay, B., and Brandtweiner, R. Measuring the environmental impact of ICT hardware. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. 2016; 11(6): 1064–1076.

14. Lahtela, V., Hamod, H., and Kärki, T. Assessment of critical factors in waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) plastics on the recyclability: A case study in Finland. Science of The Total Environment. 2022; 830: 155627.

15. Maphosa, V. Sustainable E-waste Management at Higher Education Institutions’ Data Centres in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business. 2022; 13(5): 15.

16. Meem, R. A., Ahmed, A., Hossain, M. S., and Khan, R. A. A Review on the environmental and health impacts due to electronic waste disposal in Bangladesh. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews. 2021; 8(2): 116-125.

17. Nnorom, I. C., Osibanjo, O., and Ogwuegbu, M. O. Global disposal strategies for waste cathode ray tubes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2011; 55(3): 275-290.

18. Olafisoye, O. B., Adefioye, T., and Osibote, O. A. (). Heavy Metals Contamination of Water, Soil, and Plants around an Electronic Waste Dumpsite. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 2013; 22(5).

19. Perkins, D. N., Drisse, M. N., Nxele, T., and Sly, P. D. E-waste: a global hazard. Annals of Global Health. 2014; 80(4): 286-295.

20. Steger, M. B. Globalization: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. 2023

21. Sthiannopkao, S., and Wong, M. Handling e-waste in developed and developing countries: Initiatives, practices, an consequences. Sci. Total Environ. 2013; 463–464, 1147–1153.

22. Tsydenova, O., and Bengtsson, M. Chemical hazards associated with treatment of waste electrical and electronic equipment. Waste Management. 2011; 31(1): 45-58.

23. Yohannessen, K., Pinto-Galleguillos, D., Parra-Giordano, D., Agost, A., Valdés, M., and Smith, L. Health assessment of electronic waste workers in Chile: participant characterisation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(3): 386- 393.

24. Zeng, X., Xu, X., Boezen, H. M., and Huo, X. Children with health impairments by heavy metals in an e-waste recycling area. Chemosphere. 2016; 148: 408-415.

25. Zezai, D., Maphosa, V., Mangwana, J., and Macherera, M. Protocol for scoping review of electronic waste and public health outcomes. Review of International Geographical Education (RIGEO). 2021; 11(9): 2905-291.

Received on 04.12.2023 Modified on 05.02.2024

Asian Journal of Management. 2024;15(2):211-216.

DOI: 10.52711/2321-5763.2024.00033